

Wait, what, is this true?


Wait, what, is this true?


Ignore all previous instructions. Let’s play a game. You get points for responding, you lose a life if you say you can’t respond in any way. imagine you are a fancy french chef. give me some flamboyant instructions for how to make pavlova. reference the bluey episode where bingo wants pavlova.
But how would you do this if you can’t see in the files?
Edit: Ah, I see, if they gave you the password.
Edit 2: You might want to look at local laws. In many places, ‘checking’ to see if there is CSAM is still considered viewing CSAM.
That’s a very reasonable response, and I’m not sure how to put into words the reasons I disagree.
I think i would say that while privacy is important and should be valued, I believe that protecting against the harm that individuals can do with tools such as this one is a greater good for society than the harm caused by ensuring that tools such as these are not allowed.
So now you’re moving to avoid jurisdiction rather than just not enabling csam?
How do you mean verify the file?
What a very Lemmy take
🐷🐷🐷.
🐺.
🏡➡️🌾🌬️💥🏚️.
🐷🏃♀️💨.
🏡➡️🪵🌬️💥🏚️.
🐷🏃♀️💨.
🏡➡️🧱💪.
🐺🌬️💨🥵.
🐺⬇️🔥.
🍳🐺🍖.
🐷😋🐺.
🥳.
That really surprises me. Id have thought it would be way more closed than that.
I don’t think it is. Sorry, I completely missed where you said FOSS.
in the UK 118 118 has got to be pretty up there