小莱卡

So the US is still on top 👍

One is labeled as authoritarian dystopia while the other as a beacon of freedom, it’s like we live in the upside down.

the new york times told me so i repeat every chance i get.

as a western leftist i am willing to sacrifice millions of lives of irani people because the new york times told me women were oppressed you dumb tankie! its a sacrifice i am willing to make!

yea i am the brainwashed, yet you are the one parroting the media narrative while they’re getting bombed.

look, oppressed women everywhere https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3HVXSMsRCY

There are thousands of videos of foreigneirs strolling in Iran where you can see women walking around freely, the narrative youre spewing is a stupid propaganda point to justify a bloody war with Iran.

There is no such thing as a “leftist” that supports a bloody invasion to “liberate women”.

Authoritarian as in not allowing westerners to take over the country resources.

when ideology is so internalized that you end up in the side of propietary spyware as whatsapp.

Nick’s really the only writer worth reading in that website.

should start saying gringo, it also started as a way to protest against us troops (green-go)

I prefer gringo thanks.

You see, the countries that have stood up against the US are the ones that suffer the sanctions because the US dominates the world financial system.

In Mexico City we even have a museum dedicated to foreign interventions, and we are not really an AES state.

I wonder what kind of acrobatics occupied Korea has to go through in their national history books.

People also forget what they did and continue to do in the marshall islands and their literal apartheid there.

All of the “radio free X” are CIA outlets.

I’m a farmer and in my country people use fireworks to scare sparrows away to this day, some even shoot them.

Anti-Semitism, Herzl insisted, “is impossible to escape.” And anyone who says otherwise is a “soft-hearted” visionary, who believes that “the ultimate perfection of humanity” is “possible.” Herzl rejected as naïve the political Left view that humans can embrace equality. Humans are inherently corrupt and will forever remain so. Anyone “who would found this hope for improved conditions on the ultimate perfection of humanity, would indeed be painting a Utopia!”7

For both Herzl and Hitler, the Jews constituted one people, distinct from the people in whose company they dwelt. “It might… be objected that I am giving a handle to anti-Semitism when I say we are a people—one people; that I am hindering the assimilation of Jews,” Herzl wrote. But this wasn’t the case, he countered. Anti-Semitism, he argued, was inherent in the souls of men. As such, it didn’t matter whether he called Jews a nation or a religious community. Either way, anti-Semitism would continue to flourish; it was an inescapable part of being a non-Jew. Gentiles had no choice but to be anti-Semites. In modern parlance, Herzl might say that hatred of Jews is part of the gentiles’ genetic code, and that no amount of social engineering is ever going to change it. So, assimilation could hardly be frustrated by Herzl calling Jews a distinct people, since anti-Semitism, permanent and irremediable, ensured that Jews would never be truly assimilated.

From “Israel, a beachhead in the middle east” by Stephen Gowans.

The whole foundation of Herzl political zionism is his belief that antisemitism is an inherent attribute of humans, really it’s that stupid. Theodore herzl was your average redditor parroting that greed is human nature but with antisemitism.

Bummer, i wanted him to say that the soviets were nazi allies during ww2.